Barack Hussein Obama and his ilk should understand that abusing the US Constitution may have dire consequences. Italian lamp posts and military intervention aside, the Liberals in America are busy fast-tracking legislation without proper notification and debate.

“Hugo Chávez’s coalition-building efforts suffered a setback yesterday when the Honduran military sent its president packing for abusing the nation’s constitution,” writes Mary Anastasia O’Grady.

“It seems that President Mel Zelaya miscalculated when he tried to emulate the success of his good friend Hugo in reshaping the Honduran Constitution to his liking.”

Defending Zelaya and demanding his return to power are Fidel Castro, Daniel Ortega, Hillary Clinton, Barack Hussein Obama as well as Hugo Chávez himself. It’s very disturbing to have the head of the US State Department and her boss defending tyrants.

Ordinary citizens of Honduras must have a very empty feeling knowing the United States government is treating them similar to Iranian citizens who want Democracy, free and honest elections with the liberties that go with a fairly elected leadership that uphold rule of law not change it to increase power and control.

How long will it be before protestor’s at Tea Parties around the US are arrested or maybe even shot at or beaten? Some might laugh but Obama has demonstrated nothing in defense of freedom for average citizens and seems to defend the likes of Hamas, Iranian Mullah’s and South American tyrants. He must be envious of that type of government authority.

“While Honduran law allows for a constitutional rewrite, the power to open that door does not lie with the president. A constituent assembly can only be called through a national referendum approved by its Congress.

But Mr. Zelaya declared the vote on his own and had Mr. Chávez ship him the necessary ballots from Venezuela. The Supreme Court ruled his referendum unconstitutional, and it instructed the military not to carry out the logistics of the vote as it normally would do.

The top military commander, Gen. Romeo Vásquez Velásquez, told the president that he would have to comply. Mr. Zelaya promptly fired him. The Supreme Court ordered him reinstated. Mr. Zelaya refused.”

The world press and many leaders are calling the military actions in Honduras a coup failing to point out that military commanders were following a court order to defend the rule of law and the constitution, and that the Honduran Congress asserted itself for that purpose, too.

Mrs. Clinton is certainly on board with other tyrants in non-Democracies. Yesterday she accused Honduras of violating “the precepts of the Interamerican Democratic Charter” and said it “should be condemned by all.” Fidel Castro did just that. Mr. Chávez pledged to overthrow the new government.

Obama explicitly stated he would not get involved in Iranian affairs but his administration is doing just that in Honduras while siding with Marxist/Communist ilk from neighboring countries.

Many Hondurans are engaging in their own brand of ”Tea Parties” with street protests against Zelaya’s heavy-handed tactics. Last Friday a large number of military reservists took their turn in protests.

“We won’t go backwards,” one sign said. “We want to live in peace, freedom and development.”

American’s should take note and realize that Obama and Congress are working overtime to send the United States into an economic tailspin in order to justify government takeover of private business, the banking system and develop inordinate control over all other financial institutions.

Ms. O’Grady continues:

Earlier this month he [Zelaya] hosted an OAS general assembly and led the effort, along side OAS Secretary General José Miguel Insulza, to bring Cuba back into the supposedly democratic organization.

The OAS response is no surprise. Former Argentine Ambassador to the U.N. Emilio Cárdenas told me on Saturday that he was concerned that “the OAS under Insulza has not taken seriously the so-called ‘democratic charter.’ It seems to believe that only military ‘coups’ can challenge democracy. The truth is that democracy can be challenged from within, as the experiences of Venezuela, Bolivia, Ecuador, Nicaragua, and now Honduras, prove.” A less-kind interpretation of Mr. Insulza’s judgment is that he doesn’t mind the Chávez-style coup.

The US Constitution is meant to have checks and balances with independence between the branches that keep presidents from becoming dictators.

Mrs. Clinton and Barack Hussein Obama are on the wrong side of the US Constitution and defense of freedom loving citizens in the world. The Liberals in the US Congress are now in lock step with Obama. Indeed!

Barack Hussein Obama, Appeaser-In-Chief, would like to rid the world of missile defense systems to the applause and behind the scenes snickering of enemies to the United States.

North Korea has announced it may launch a long-range missile in the direction of Obama’s home state of Hawaii. (Note: Homestate via Kenya and Indonesia)

The Wall Street Journal provides a recent exchange between Arizona Republican Trent Franks and Lieutenant-General Patrick O’Reilly, head of the Missile Defense Agency, in a hearing last month at the House Subcommittee on Strategic Forces:

Rep. Franks: “Do you believe that the threat from long-range missiles has increased or decreased in the last six months as it relates to the homeland here?”

Gen. O’Reilly: “Sir, I believe it has increased significantly. . . . The demonstration of capability of the Iranian ability to put a sat[ellite] into orbit, albeit small, shows that they are progressing in that technology. Additionally, the Iranians yesterday demonstrated a solid rocket motor test which is . . . disconcerting. Third, the North Koreans demonstrated . . . that they are improving in their capacity and we are very concerned about that.”

The Obama budget is causing defense cuts and limiting US capabilities to defend itself. Additional interceptors planned for the ground-based program in Alaska are being limited with the number around 30 interceptor missiles located at Fort Greely in Alaska and Vandenberg Air Force Base in California.

Also part of the Obama defense cuts is the Airborne Laser, which is designed to shoot down incoming missiles in the boost phase, before they can release decoys and at a point in the missile trajectory when it would fall back down on enemy territory.

The Obama Administration is considering killing the proposed plan for a missile defense system in Europe, which would place interceptors in Poland and a radar in the Czech Republic, and is intended to protect Europe against Iranian missiles. This system would also protect the US by providing an additional layer of defense for the Eastern seaboard, which is a long way from the Alaskan defenses.

Obama will soon be visiting Russia and is prepared to appease them by reducing the US nuclear arsenal and agreeing to moving the deployment of the European missile defense system or at least some radar to southern Russia and Azerbaijan. From a geographical perspective, neither location would add much since an Iranian missile headed for Western Europe or the US would be on the periphery of the radars’ vision.

If North Korea launches a missile towards Hawaii will Obama order to have it shot down or will he continue to shoot down necessary technology that would make the US and its allies safe from terrorist regimes?

This is a test Mr. Obama. Indeed!

Or would Obama and his ilk tell the truth to the American public?

Answers: Yes and No in that order.

From the Washington Examiner:

Natural forces as opposed to human activity are largely responsible for temperature fluctuations, according to a new study the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) released today as Congress prepares to vote on global warming legislation.

Internal email messages show the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) suppressed the report and silenced the author because the scientific evidence did not square with the Obama administration’s agenda of regulating carbon dioxide, CEI claims. The EPA has become overly reliant upon outdated information from the United Nations and has ignored major new scientific developments, the censored study concludes.

“While we hoped that the EPA would release the final report, we’re tired of waiting for this agency to become transparent, even though its administrator has been talking transparency, since she took office,” said CEI General Counsel Sam Kazman.

New scientific data highlighted in the report shows that ocean cycles and solar cycles are probably the most important factors behind temperature fluctuations. Moreover, satellite information now indicates there is little chance of endangerment from greenhouse gases, according to the report.

Some of the major developments overlooked by EPA official include a continued decline in global temperatures, an emerging consensus that hurricanes will not be more frequent or intense and new studies that demonstrate water vapor will have a moderating influence on temperature.

Going forward, CEI has called upon the EPA to independently analyze the science and to become more transparent in its own reporting.

The censored report, by Alan Carlin and John Davidson, points out that the EPA has not done its own evaluation of the global warming theory. Rather, it has relied on analyses by others, mostly the U.N.’s IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) report.

That report, however, was a political document and not a scientific one. Knowing that current scientific research disproves the anthropogenic global warming theory, the U.N. ordered that no recent research be considered in the IPCC report.

Carlin and Davidson recite the scientific work that shows rather clearly that human activity is a minor factor in climate change, which has been occurring from the beginning of Earth’s history to the present.

Obama’s EPA suppressed the Carlin/Davidson report and tried to keep it secret for political reasons. The two scientists’ superior declines to make their report public because “the administration has decided to move forward on endangerment.”

The emails obtained by the CEI are revealing. Here, the two scientists’ superior declines to make their report public because “the administration has decided to move forward on endangerment.” Carlin and Davidson are ordered not to communicate to the public their conclusion that the global warming theory is phony and not based on real science.

Obama has placed his administration on a fast-track to take control of every aspect of our lives, to takeover private business and turn individualism into an afterthought.

Obama is attempting to have us play by his rules, which are “Rules for Radicals.” Indeed!