Reading the title to this post you might conclude that rabies and Elizabeth Warren go together. Ms. Warren is the Harvard professor who couldn’t get a confirmation to head Obama’s “Consumer Protection Agency.”

But back to Massachusetts and rabies:

For the first time in 75 years, there is a human case of rabies in Massachusetts.

The Department of Public Health made the announcement Friday, saying the patient is a man in his 60′s from Barnstable County on the Cape and that he is in the hospital in critical condition.

The exact cause of how he was infected is not yet known, but it was likely from a bat.

I believe authorities should check to see if the man was at an Elizabeth Warren rally where she is attempting to unseat Scott Brown, the Republican Senator, to continue the history of radical left-wingers sent to the Beltway by Massachusetts voters.

Saying Ms. Warren is a left-winger isn’t being inaccurate. She’s actually much closer to a seething Marxist who invokes anti-capitalist, anti-free market, anti-US Constitution spittle wherever she speaks.

Oh, the article says bats were found in the man’s home and investigators said it’s possible the man never realized he was bitten because the bats’ teeth are so small. Maybe they’re confusing the bats and Elizabeth Warren. Her venom can spread through a television set or streaming video on the Internet.

Elizabeth Warren has even taken credit for laying the foundation for Occupy Wall Street. Talk about getting rabies!

“I created much of the intellectual foundation for what they do. I support what they do.”

 

However, Ms. Warren is taking her words out of the mouth of Vladimir Lenin.

Communist morality is that which serves this struggle and unites the working people against all exploitation, against all petty private property; for petty property puts into the hands of one person that which has been created by the labour of the whole of society. In our country the land is common property. …

Here is what you might call the Elizabeth Warren Manifesto which can also be linked to the Communist Manifesto:

 

Warren also likes to appear in George Soros’ MoveOn.org radical left-wing website with her diatribe against American entrepreneurs and real job creators:

There is nobody in this country who got rich on his own. Nobody. You built a factory out there — good for you!

But I want to be clear. You moved your goods to market on the roads the rest of us paid for. You hired workers the rest of us paid to educate. You were safe in your factory because of police forces and fire forces that the rest of us paid for. You didn’t have to worry that maurauding bands would come and seize everything at your factory, and hire someone to protect against this, because of the work the rest of us did. Now look, you built a factory and it turned into something terrific, or a great idea — God bless. Keep a big hunk of it.

But part of the underlying social contract is you take a hunk of that and pay forward for the next kid who comes along.

Warren’s argument derives from the notion that other people paid for various public goods, and that the entrepreneur in question thus doesn’t have a claim to anything more than a “big hunk,” the size of which shall be determined by “us,” i.e., a committee of the people who paid for various public goods, of what she has earned.

Elizabeth Warren has a strain of rabies I call Communism, Marxism, anti-Americanism, anti-Capitalism, anti-freedom and anti-liberty.

Liberally Conservative appreciates your comments that abide by our guidelines:

The following is a reprint By Joseph W. McQuaid – New Hampshire Union Leader Publisher

*******************

Ron Paul is a dangerous man. While his domestic libertarian views are quite attractive to some voters fed up with politics as usual, it is Paul’s position on issues of our national security that are truly dangerous.

Those views have been largely overlooked by a news media more interested in the presidential “horse race” than in the candidates’ positions on issues. But we expect New Hampshire primary voters will examine the facts and act accordingly.

A Wall Street Journal columnist notes that Paul is “a leading spokesman for, and recycler of, the long and familiar litany of charges that point to the United States as a leading agent of evil and injustice, the militarist victimizer of millions who want only to live in peace.”

Perhaps this warped view is why Paul believes that al-Qaida terrorists caught in the United States ought to be treated as common criminals, not enemy combatants. He wants them read Miranda rights to which they are not entitled and he wants them tried and sentenced in civil courts rather than by military tribunals.

This is nothing short of nuts. What is needed to competently fight a war, and al-Qaida is indeed at war with us, is the ability to gather information. Telling the enemy that it has a “right to remain silent” is absurd.

Paul believes that if a U.S. citizen throws in with al-Qaida or associated groups overseas, where he plots American death and destruction, we need to somehow find him, arrest him, and bring him back to stand civil trial here rather than eliminate him, even if that is the only option.

We are in a much different kind of war than we have ever faced, but Paul doesn’t see it. He has repeatedly said that U.S. aggression is responsible for 9-11 and other attacks on America from radical jihadists.

He has repeatedly said that we should allow Iran to continue to develop a nuclear weapon. This is the same country whose leadership vows death to America, the “Satanic power,” and who wants Israel wiped from the map.

Never mind Paul being the favored candidate of the lunatic fringe (see white supremacists, anti-Semites, truthers, etc.). Never mind his refusal to disavow a third-party run (which would only help President Obama’s reelection).

His defenders say they admire Ron Paul’s “consistency.” It is true, Paul has been consistently spouting this nonsense. It is about time New Hampshire voters showed him the door.

*******************

Liberally Conservative and its author concur. (See related post directly below)

Liberally Conservative appreciates your comments that abide by our guidelines:

Rumblings have begun in earnest now that many GOP and Independent voters are unhappy with the field of candidates offered, now dwindling as we watch Newt Gingrich and Ron Paul begin to give way under the weight of their many deficiencies.

Mitt Romney, while certainly with many warts, is the best the GOP has to offer and it’s now coming down to electability and who is best suited to beat Barack Obama in November 2012. We’re at a crossroads for freedom and liberty in the United States and one more term of Obama may be the end to a Constitutional Republic and free market system that has proven to be the best form of society known to the world.

So here we sit with talk of a third-party candidate who would only drain votes from the Republican nominee. This is selfish and unacceptable but it’s a free choice and right of qualified American citizens to run for president.

The key words seem to really be “selfish” and maybe “self-serving” or even “poor loser.” Regardless, former New Mexico Governor Gary Johnson, who has completely fallen off the radar in polling, will be announcing his candidacy for the Libertarian Party. Rules in Florida already disqualify him from the ballot in that state which does offer some relief.

A larger worry would be the possibility that Ron Paul will leave the GOP field and jump into the Libertarian mix. Paul has a lot of followers and he could do plenty of damage to the GOP nominee and this country if he throws his hat into the third-party ring. He too would be disqualified from the Florida ballot.

I already have a very low opinion of both Johnson and Paul, “Moonbats” in their own right, with off the wall beliefs that move well beyond the US Constitution promoting ideas of isolationism, legal drug use and what seems to be a 60s Hippie mentality. You know, free love, screw in your local park, shoot up at will, free needles and drug counseling. All at the taxpayers expense of course. The Founding Fathers are rolling in their graves.

We won’t know what Mr. Paul’s decision will be since he has until May 5 to make his decision while he plays coy when asked about a third-party run. He’s a candidate for the GOP nomination and knows full well jumping ship helps reelect Barack Obama so this makes him a turncoat no better than Benedict Arnold.

Ross Perot gave us Bill Clinton who could only muster 43-percent of the vote nationally but still made a trip to the White House. Ron Paul has enough backing, cash and name recognition that his candidacy off the GOP ticket could be a disaster for Republicans and the United States.

Some, including Ron Paul, claim a third-party candidate would not siphon off votes from the Republicans but polling over the years and actual elections have proven that theory to be incorrect. Ralph Nader cost Al Gore the victory in Florida, not hanging chads or SCOTUS. Ron Paul would take more than Ralph Nader did so slice it anyway you like it – if Ron Paul moves to a third-party candidacy we are in trouble as nation, unless you prefer socialism and Marxist theory.

Let’s not forget the rumblings coming from Donald Trump. His ego may very well be damaged since he had to cancel his NewsMax debate because only two candidates offered to show up. This could be enough to have him jump into the mix. Don’t trust Mr. Trump, he’s the guy who donates to both sides of the aisle as long as it is good for him. Keep in mind, Trump donated $50,000 to Rahm Emanuel’s mayoral campaign in December 2010. Trumps tells us how much he loves America but if he helps put Barack Obama back in the White House that is proof that Trump only loves Trump.

Wrap yourself in the American flag all you want but a third-party candidate coming out of the Republican party only helps the Marxist-in-Chief – Barack H. Obama. Can you live with that? Some selfish politicians and reality TV hosts seem to think they can. Unfortunately, many US citizens prefer it that way too.

Liberally Conservative appreciates your comments that abide by our guidelines: