I didn’t watch the Super Bowl so I missed the interruption by Barack Hussein Obama to discuss healthcare, or Obamacare with Katie Couric, that perky Lefty who is taking a forced pay cut.

“I want to come back and have a large meeting, Republicans and Democrats, to go through systematically all the best ideas that are out there and move it forward,” claims Mr. Obama.

In a very weak attempt to demonstrate bi-partisanship, transparency and reconciliation with the opposing views of those radical right-wing extremists this is only a circus stunt and has nothing to do with open debate on C-Span. What does Obama hope to accomplish on February 25th with a half-day meeting at Blair House across the street from the White House?

The leader of Obama’s “state media”, the NY Times has this to say about Mr. Obama’s gesture:

“In making the gesture on Sunday, Mr. Obama is in effect calling the hand of Republicans who had chastised him for not honoring a campaign pledge to hold health care deliberations in the open, broadcast by C-Span, and for not allowing Republicans at the bargaining table.”

How many times and how fast can you say, “Snake Oil Salesman”?

The Washington Post, another loyal member of the state-run media reports that White House officials report

“…said the president will come to the health-care summit armed with a merged version of the two bills that Democrats strong-armed through the two chambers with almost no GOP backing.”

“In separate statements Sunday, Democratic leaders praised the president for calling the bipartisan summit but made clear they are not prepared to give up on the progress they made last year.”

Imagine that!

The fact is Democrats had the chance to pass Obamacare, they had the votes and call one straying Republican bi-partisanship. American’s are not easily fooled twice by Obama and his teleprompter eloquence.

Too late! Obama and his ilk have had ample time to reach out to Republicans but instead have called them obstructionists. The problem is Republicans have had a plan which has been on public display but is being obstructed by Democrats.

Obama’s infomercial was more of the same only this time the “Emperor” and his plan are exposed and American’s aren’t interested.

BLIZZARD 2010!!

Barack Hussein Obama took office on January 20, 2009 and the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that the U.S. economy employed 134.6 million people and the unemployment rate stood at 7.6%.

Blaming a devastated economy Mr. Obama decided he would solve the mess “he inherited from his predecessor” (code for George W. Bush) by passing a stimulus bill, pouring billions of taxpayer dollars into the economy.

Obama “experts” promised the stimulus money would employ at least 138.6 million people. This from $862 billion of your money. If you had hope in Obama’s plan I’m sure you have little change left in your pocket.

Currently the Bureau of Labor Statistics is at it again providing real numbers that seem to suggest that Obama plan for hope and change is reflecting negatively.

BLS released its monthly jobs report for January 2010 which show the US economy shedding another net 20,000 jobs, leaving only 129.5 million jobs, almost 10 million short of that promise of hope, change and job creation.

According to Mr. Obama, as stated in his State of the Union Address, jobs are still priority number one. Attempting to divert attention from the bleak news about to appear Obama said:

“That is why jobs must be our number one focus in 2010, and that is why I am calling for a new jobs bill tonight.”

After one-year in office Mr. Obama and his brain trust suddenly decided throwing more good money after bad is a good idea for creating jobs that government can only create within its own massive conglomerate. Keep in mind, “jobs bill” is Obama code for more of that stimulus.

This is how a free market, capitalist economy works:

• Only the private sector, in pursuit of opportunity, can create real jobs.
• Government should relax taxes to individuals across the income horizon.
• Government should stop spending money and pay off its incredible debt.
• Government should provide tax reduction and credits to business so they can invest, grow and create jobs.
• Government should extend or make permanent the George W. Bush taxes cuts.

Lame ideas such as providing a tax credit to small business for hiring new employees does not create jobs, the above suggestions is putting the economics of job creation ahead of the need for new employees. It’s not that difficult to figure out if you’re being honest and Obama, Reid, Pelosi and the whole administration is as dishonest to the American people as one would expect from left-leaning ideologues.

Back to that job creation. This week, the Obama administration announced that the number of government employees will grow to 2.15 million this year. Growing government creates more waste, increases the deficit and does nothing to spur growth in the private sector. It’s lipstick on a pig and the pork in Washington is smoldering.

Jonathan Rauch explains:

“Economic thinkers have recognized for generations that every person has two ways to become wealthier. One is to produce more, the other is to capture more of what others produce. … Washington looks increasingly like a public-works jobs program for lawyers and lobbyists, a profit center for professionals who are in business for themselves.”

Barack Obama claims he is focused on job creation. Unfortunately, the erstwhile Obama needs his eyes tested. Indeed!

Is Eric Holder, the US Attorney General actually the Commander-in-Chief or is Barack Hussein Obama delivering his marching orders?

Mr. Holder released a letter yesterday to Minority Leader Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY) defending the Obama administration’s criminal justice system approach to prosecuting the war against al-Qaeda. Defending his administration’s handling of the Flight 253 terrorist, Holder wrote:

“I made the decision to charge Mr. Abdulmutallab with federal crimes, and to seek his detention in connection with those charges, the knowledge of, and with no objection from, all other relevant departments of the government.”

In sworn testimony by Director of National Intelligence Adm. Dennis Blair answering a question by Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME), Mr. Blair directly contradicts AG Holder.

Sen. Collins asked Mr. Blair if he had been consulted about how Abdulmutallab should have been interrogated. Mr. Blair responded:

“I was not consulted” and has since said his remarks have been “misconstrued.”

Retractions don’t count for much when you are contradicting previous testimony under oath.

I propose that Holder and Blair meet with Congress, together and under oath, to settle the argument so we may understand what side the Attorney General comes down on. It’s our belief, based on his actions and his work as an attorney in civilian life, that he protects the Jihadists and wishes to convey on them all rights under the US Constitution as provided a real US citizen.

In his letter to Mr. McConnell, Mr. Holder wrote:

“Neither advising Abdulmutallab of his Miranda rights nor granting him access to counsel prevents us from obtaining intelligence from him. On the contrary, history shows that the federal justice system is an extremely effective tool for gathering intelligence.” Holder appears to be arguing that reading suspects their Miranda rights is a great way to get them to talk.

We didn’t know Abdulmutallab, a citizen of Nigeria, had “rights” in the United States. Silly us!

American University law professor Kenneth Anderson notes:

“The point of offering suspects the Miranda warning and associated rights is not in order to persuade them to talk, but in order to make sure they know they don’t have to and, if they have much in the way of brains, won’t.”

Weekly Standard’s Stephen F. Hayes points to this exchange between CNN’s Paula Zahn and Holder about American Taliban John Walker Lindh from January 28, 2002.

Zahn: “How much pressure should they put on this man to get information out of him as they interrogate him?”

Holder replied: “Well, I mean, it’s hard to interrogate him at this point now that he has a lawyer and now that he is here in the United States. But to the extent that we can get information from him, I think we should.”

So Blair contradicts Holder, then himself via a retraction and Holder contradicts himself from a conversation he had in 2002.

Speaking at the Heritage Foundation, Sen. McConnell says: (Full Video below transcript)

“The fact remains that all the intelligence he possessed concerning the locations, training techniques, and communications methods of Al Qaeda in Yemen is perishable. Yemeni forces needed that information on December 25th, not six weeks later. Meanwhile, the American people are left to wonder whether, in place of interrogations, their safety depends on terrorists having families who can persuade them to talk.”

“No one denies that a balance must be struck between preserving civil liberties and protecting the homeland. No one wants to sacrifice one for the other. But in many cases, all that’s involved is a simple question of judgment. And when a judgment call has to be made, our priorities should be clear: keeping Americans safe should always win out, within the law.”

Its Barack Obama’s role to balance national security and civil liberties so we wonder: Did Obama instruct Mr. Holder to provide Miranda rights similar to his order to troops in Iraq and Afghanistan or was Mr. Holder acting alone?

Watching the Obama administration play this out we put our money on the fact that this group of political ilk has an interest in protecting enemy combatants, terrorists, al-Qaeda, Taliban and any other group by any other name with an objective to destroy America. Indeed!

Does Barack Hussein Obama ever quit looking into the camera and continue to lie to the America public?

Apparently the answer is a resounding NO!

Enter the Obama budget:

But wait, Obama is proposing a spending freeze.

Obama’s administration claims it would halt spending increases for $447 billion of their total budget, with a total of $15 billion to be saved. That amount, touted as something so significant is less than one-half of one-percent off of last year’s spending. This isn’t even an across-the-board spending freeze; it is an aggregate one.

These so-called “spending cuts” are in parts of the budget that are immediately channeled to others. Even though the federal government doesn’t need any money for the Census next year, Mr. Obama counts the $5 billion spent this year as a “spending cut” that can be immediately spent on other government programs, such as a 16% increase in Department of Education funding, a 6.8% increase in Department of Energy funding, and increases for ineffective Health and Human Services programs like Head Start and sex education.

If you call in during the next 5-minutes you will receive Stimulus II, another spending spree that will dwarf and most likely eliminate the “freeze.”

You will also receive tax hikes, including higher taxes on families earning more than $250,000 and a brand new tax on financial institutions to pay for the failed automobile union bailout, but you need to call the number on your screen now.

And as a special bonus, if you order right now, a record national debt will be sent to you “free.”

It’s a good thing Obama is forecasting the weather. The Obama administration now forecasts $5.08 trillion in debt over the next five years; that is 35% more debt than they forecast just 12 months ago. OOPS!

Now if only Congress and Obama would publicly disclose the massive unfunded obligations of Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, then put those programs on long-term budgets; and enact the necessary entitlement and program reforms that can keep government within those limits. Indee!

Please, call the fire department!

US House of Representatives — US Senate

Create your own tea party, write and call today!

Maybe you don’t know who Lech Walesa is. You should learn and listen to his warning.

From Anne Kane at American Thinker:

From the Gdansk Lenin Shipyards to the city of the Back of the Yards, Lech Walesa, former President of Poland, and preeminent community organizer, attended a fundraiser on Friday, January 29, to endorse Adam Andrzejewski (an gee eff skie) who is one of six Republicans seeking the nomination of his party for Governor of Illinois.

Walesa , who led trade union strikes in Poland in the early 1980s, managed to bring about needed economic and political change for laborers without resorting to violence.

He led the Solidarność or Solidarity, a broad anti-Soviet social movement. Its activities included workers taking to the streets to demand the right to self-govern in a communist country. Eventually, Solidarity claimed victory, and the Polish people elected Walesa as president in 1990.

These were remarkable events, remarkable times and helped contribute to the fall of the Berlin Wall. Mr. Walesa’s name stands with Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher from the same era of fighting communism.

Mr. Walesa had this to say about today’s America:

The United States is only one superpower. Today they lead the world. Nobody has doubts about it. Militarily. They also lead economically but they’re getting weak. But they don’t lead morally and politically anymore. The world has no leadership.

The United States was always the last resort and hope for all other nations. There was the hope, whenever something was going wrong, one could count on the United States. Today, we lost that hope.

So much for “Hope” because the change we’re getting in Washington may be similar to what Mr. Walesa fought against to gain freedom for his workers and the Polish people.

In the video below Andrew Breitbart’s “Big Government” interviews Mr. Walesa where he states, “America Is Moving Toward Socialism.”

Change for Solidarity in America, change for Conservatism. Indeed!

Yes, I remember the days at Chicago Stadium watching Michael Jordan perform his liftoff’s from behind the free throw stripe on his way to a miraculous dunk. I remember that gleaming and infectious smile of Air Jordan, still famous for his basketball greatness and his silhouette on Air Nike products.

Now we have Air Pelosi, Speaker of the House of Representatives, known as “stretch” by lawyer and talk radio host Mark Levin for either her frequent trips to the plastic surgeon or botox treatment taking advantage of her position and power. Whatever Ms. Pelosi has been doing to look “young” it’s not working but her eyes are beginning to look like those on a fly.

Now Judicial Watch has uncovered new documents totaling 2,000 on the air travel habits of this poor excuse for a public servant, self-annointed as “Queen Pelosi of the House.”

The headline is absolutely shocking:

House Speaker’s Military Travel Cost the United States Air Force $2,100,744.59 over a Two-Year Period, Including $101,429 for In-Flight Expenses

The details are worse:

• Speaker Pelosi used Air Force aircraft to travel back to her district at an average cost of $28,210.51 per flight. The average cost of an international CODEL is $228,563.33. Of the 103 Pelosi-led congressional delegations (CODEL), 31 trips included members of the House Speaker’s family.
• One CODEL traveling from Washington, DC, through Tel Aviv, Israel to Baghdad, Iraq May 15-20, 2008, “to discuss matters of mutual concern with government leaders” included members of Congress and their spouses and cost $17,931 per hour in aircraft alone. Purchases for the CODEL included: Johnny Walker Red scotch, Grey Goose vodka, E&J brandy, Bailey’s Irish Crème, Maker’s Mark whiskey, Courvoisier cognac, Bacardi Light rum, Jim Beam whiskey, Beefeater gin, Dewars scotch, Bombay Sapphire gin, Jack Daniels whiskey, Corona beer and several bottles of wine.
• According to a “Memo for Record” from a March 29—April 7, 2007, CODEL that involved a stop in Israel, “CODEL could only bring Kosher items into the Hotel. Kosher alcohol for mixing beverages in the Delegation room was purchased on the local economy i.e. Bourbon, Whiskey, Scotch, Vodka, Gin, Triple Sec, Tequila, etc.”
• The Department of Defense advanced a CODEL of 56 members of Congress and staff $60,000 to travel to Louisiana and Mississippi July 19-22, 2008, to “view flood relief advances from Hurricane Katrina.” The three-day trip cost the U.S. Air Force $65,505.46, exceeding authorized funding by $5,505.46.

“Speaker Pelosi has a history of wasting taxpayer funds with her boorish demands for military travel. And these documents suggest the Speaker’s congressional delegations are more about partying than anything else,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.

In March 2009, Judicial Watch received documents from the Department of Defense detailing Nancy Pelosi’s abuse of a system which provided military aircraft for the transportation of the Speaker of the House. The documents, which were acquired through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), detail the attempts by DOD staff to accommodate Pelosi’s numerous requests for military escorts and military aircraft as well as the speaker’s last minute cancellations and changes

See the entire scandal at Air Pelosi Scandal

Let the frog-marching begin. Indeed!

The Cold War-era cartoon below uses humor to tout the dangers of Communism and the benefits of capitalism. Spend just over 9-minutes to watch the video and decide who the villain in the cartoon is today and let us know your feelings in the comment section. Thanks!

Make mine freedom, indeed!

The more I try to digest Barack Hussein Obama the more I get acute indigestion. No, I couldn’t listen to his “State of the Union” address this week and turned down the radio when snippets of his voice came over the air waves.

Reading about the speech in the aftermath I came to believe not much was different, it was the same old line read off a teleprompter promising this, promising that, criticizing the past, ensuring he would get what he wants and then………WHAT? Obama verbally attacked the Justices (well at least five while four received collateral damage) for a recent decision upholding the US Constitution in the case Citzens United v. Federal Elections Commission.

“Last week, the Supreme Court reversed a century of law to open the floodgates for special interests—including foreign corporations—to spend without limit in our elections. Well I don’t think American elections should be bankrolled by America’s most powerful interests, or worse, by foreign entities. They should be decided by the American people, and that’s why I’m urging Democrats and Republicans to pass a bill that helps to right this wrong.”

This was such poor judgment but I’m sure very well planned. What followed was a continuation of the frontal assault with attacks from the sides and rear. Sun Tzu would be proud (THE ART OF WAR) while Democratic senators, congressmen and cabinet officials surrounding the six seated justices in attendance as a courtesy stood, applauded and cheered (or jeered) depending on your point of view.

Certainly, not everyone agrees with the Supreme Court and a whole discourse is available in Mark Levin’s Men in Black: How the Supreme Court Is Destroying America.

The annual address known at the State of the Union is heard around the world by the person occupying the most powerful office in the world to the largest democratic body ever known to the world live at prime time on television, radio and streaming across the Internet.

Singling out Supreme Court justices in front of a huge audience or any audience for that matter is as distasteful and dishonest as anything imaginable. We should expect more but now we have come to expect the worse from Mr. Obama who asks for bi-partisanship, criticizes his predecessor non-stop, lies publicly to the American public and becomes irritable and threatening. He acts more like a playground bully then what is expected from his office and the respect it deserves.

The Supreme Court’s ruling in Citizens United concerned the right of labor unions and domestic corporations, including nonprofits, to express their views about candidates in media such as books, films and TV within 60 days of an election. In short, it concerned freedom of speech; in particular, an independent film critical of Hillary Clinton funded by a nonprofit corporation.

To hear the state run media one would think the Justices gave the largest companies in the world carte blanche to buy off any politician they want. We call that lobbying and it’s an art form on K-Street in the Beltway.

Certainly, Obama’s address was vetted before being issue only 30-minutes prior to reading it live before a joint session of Congress and the world. Certainly, a graduate of Harvard Law and someone who lectured on Constitutional Law would have some idea on how to research the facts and separate them from ludicrous claims.

No, Mr. Obama knew what he was doing and that was demonstrating his lack of class, humility while ignoring facts, law and Stare Decisis. Sorry, this is a man on a mission and it’s not a good thing for a Democracy. Yes, Obama has said, “words mean something” and when they are spoken with intent of malice in a public forum ambushing six members of the judiciary, and calling upon the legislative branch to deride them publicly. Setting the stage for his outrageous claim Obama began, “with all due respect” and proceeded to behave disrespectfully.

The facts are simple if you know where to look for them and any vetting process worth its salt would know that SCOTUS reversed a 1990 decision allowing a ban on free speech as brought in Citizens United, it left standing current restrictions on foreign nationals and “entities.” Also left untouched was a 100-year-old ban on domestic corporate contributions to political campaigns to which Obama was presumably referring to erroneously. Obama got the whole thing incorrect in only 72 words without reference to the US Constitution or First Amendment, something quite visible in the decision by the court.

Mr. Obama and anyone else may criticize rulings by the Supreme Court; it’s done all the time. However, rudeness and disrespect in public from the occupant of the highest office in the land requires a public apology.

Mr. Obama, it’s time to make that apology but we won’t hold our breath. He lacks the character to stand up and be a man and to be a true leader. Indeed!

See Also: Why the pre-eminent First Amendment expert disagrees with Obama.

In Barack Hussein Obama’s “State of the Union” speech last evening he was making a dire attempt at spreading the love while sending a message he’s not done, he “doesn’t quit.”

American’s should take him at his word for he does intend to “change” America, he does not intend to quit and Mr. Obama and his ego believe he’s too big to fail.

Obama is attempting to hit the reset button on his failed policy but his ideology is out in front of the average citizen and registered voters. Poll after poll has shown his favorability rating dropping and he now has the lowest rating in the first year for anyone holding his office. Maybe he is really hitting the panic button.

Obama’s “speech”, read neatly off his teleprompter where he is most comfortable, was no less than a desperate attempt to resuscitate his legislative agenda alive even though American’s reject him and his plans.

What does Obama offer? Answer: An economic mess!

“Obama Bank Tax”

Calling it a “modest fee” Obama called for a tax on banks and other financial institutions to pay back taxpayers who rescued them. The problem is these institutions have paid back loans forced upon them in many cases, with huge interest to boot. Taxpayers made substantial profits off that interest while government run institutions are running red ink, facing bankruptcy and own billions to Mr. and Ms. American citizen. You already know the names: Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, General Motors, Chrysler and they would not own any tax under the Obama plan. Taxing those who have paid back “loans” while not taxing those in bed with unions and the government. Where’s the equity in that?

Obama “New Hire Tax”

This was attempted before, in the 1970s, which was a nice feature for businesses that were already going to hire. However, businesses thinking of hiring may now postpone that waiting for this credit to become law. A better plan would be to extend the George W. Bush tax cuts and then blame him for its success.

Obama “Spending Freeze”

Mr. Obama’s spending freeze proposal would only be 1/8th of total government spending and less than one-percent of the total fiscal budget. The “spending freeze” suggestion is comparable to bailing out a cruise ship with a thimble.

Obama “Energy Production”

Is Obama parroting Sarah Palin and screaming “drill baby drill” or placating the right? Calling for new nuclear power, offshore oil and gas exploration, and other new energy technologies are an excellent idea but this isn’t new. Unfortunately, the Obama plan would be implemented through subsidies which don’t work. Opening up land and shores to the oil companies to compete and do what they do best is preferable to “green jobs” and a tepid attempt to create jobs via the government.

Obama “Foreign Policy”

No, Obama didn’t use the word “victory” but US allies have noticed and will not be sending help to Afghanistan in the near future. French President Nicolas Sarkozy publicly stated that he would not be contributing any more troops to the endeavor, this on the eve of the Afghanistan conference in London.

Obama did not use the term “war on terror” either. Obama did ignore human rights in Iran.

In “Government’s End,” Jonathan Rauch writes:

“Economic thinkers have recognized for generations that every person has two ways to become wealthier. One is to produce more, the other is to capture more of what others produce. … Washington looks increasingly like a public-works jobs program for lawyers and lobbyists, a profit center for professionals who are in business for themselves.”

In the end, the only love from Obama in Washington D.C. was to lobbyists, lawyers, unions and would only create wealth in the Beltway not across America. Indeed!

Hat Tip: Betty Albright

Here is a prescription for success for the Democrat party if they intend to “Stand By Their Plan” and assuming, of course, your definition of success is failure and loss of office. The Liberal’s seem headed for a train wreck and who are we to get in their way. Indeed!

Good evening to my Marxist friends here in the audience and across the world. Tonight, I’ve decided to shorten my speech, give my teleprompter a break, get to the facts about my first year in office and er, uh, um, continue to work in secret behind closed doors to undermine the United States Constitution, diminish the rights of a once free people and turn my ideological Saul Alinsky, Karl Marx and Vladimir Lenin beliefs into reality for everyone.

As you know, I’ve fallen below fifty-percent in recent approval rating polls and I would say, this is all due to George W. Bush.

While campaigning across this land of 57 states I made promise after promise and used my eloquence to convince you suckers I was the real deal, one who could bring America together, and I would cross party lines to get things done. However, without the cooperation of radical extremists known as Republicans I was forced to have locks changed in the Senate building, in the House and move many of our discussions into the White House bunker.

American’s yearned for a new kind of politics, something I’ve brought to Washington, but the drones, er, uh, er, American public remains confused to the terms of “hope” and “change” and don’t understand the two are not interchangeable. Change is what I have implemented and as we take over more private business, take full command of the banking system and burn down Wall Street you will begin to fully understand the meaning of change.

I will continue my quest to appear in public for speeches and appearances on television at a pace never seen before. In my first six months in office, I gave three times as many interviews as George W. Bush, four times as many prime-time news conferences as Bill Clinton, and more interviews than both combined: 93 for me, “The One”, and 61 for my two immediate predecessors.

I’ve appeared on five Sunday talk shows on the same morning, followed the next day by appearing on David Letterman, the first-ever presidential appearance on a nighttime comedy show. Following that, I squeezed in addresses to the U.S. Climate Change Summit, the U.N. General Assembly, the U.N. Security Council, and a variety of press conferences. I might add, I managed to do this all on the taxpayer’s dime. Now I met with Diane Sawyer to pretend to “change” my position once more, er, uh, or actually used more smoke and mirrors to deceive the public by using the state run media for my personal benefit.

I will continue to set unrealistic deadlines and then let them pass; I will continue to call Afghanistan the “war of necessity” with no real plan for victory, a word I still detest unless it specifically refers to me.

I will continue to delegate all important legislation to Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi, if they remain in office, while allowing Barney Frank to run Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac further into the ground and will ensure the tax cheat Charles Rangle continues writing tax code to screw the average citizen, no matter what their income level, while he works with a forensic tax accountant to hide his own tax cheating ways. This tax season we will also provide Turbo Tax lessons to Secretary Geithner just in case he decides to file his taxes.

I will continue to run that pork farm know as Earmark Congress and will fund unions while delegating more power to their leaders to take over any private business they’re associated with and all future companies they take over, by force if necessary.

It would be a mistake for me not to mention health care reform, affectionately called “Obamacare”. We will continue to hide behind closed doors, refuse promised transparency, not allow those “Right-Wing extremists” to view any portion of any bill and refuse to consider any amendments that would interfere with the complete takeover of the health care system including hospitals, doctor practices, drug companies, and medical schools while implementing death panels and free clinics with pre-death counseling and end of life pills.

I will continue to tell you how many jobs we’ve saved or created although we will be unable to substantiate the claims with any written evidence based on economic fact. Take our word for it or you may end up in a Gulag or labor camp, not yet built, but part of our government job creation bill.

Yes, I will continue to “tickle” the economy under the guise of stimulus even though much of the billions in taxpayer’s money is now in a slush, er, uh, trust fund for future use as we deem necessary.

I will continue to use debt as a leverage medium and max out our government credit card known as the US Treasury.

Yes, my policies in the past year helped us avoid a depression, I think, but didn’t do much to stop the recession I inherited at the hands of that evil doer, George W. Bush.

Some headlines have said I must “get a grip” and I’m doing my best with the help of my right hand man, “Dead Fish” Rahm Emanuel, to get a complete stranglehold around the American throat while continuing to provide the Constitutional rights to Jihadist’s around the globe.

Some would say I have “misjudged” the character of the American people but I’m more interested in working my propaganda machine to eventually bring everyone over to my side. “Whatever it takes” will be a large part of my administration in the coming year to demonstrate to American’s it’s not what you know but who you know.

With the help of our union thugs and friends at ACORN I will continue to attack, I mean, uh, er, oh, work for your trust, no matter how blind, so you too can encompass your life and your family’s life around my American dream for you. Indeed!

Thomas B. Edsall in The New Republic, Jan 20:

[T]he decline of Democratic fortunes coincides with the growing perception that Obama’s three primary legislative initiatives—health care reform, cap-and-trade, and increased regulation of the financial sector—have failed to improve the daily lives of most voters, voters who are impacted by the worst economy in 70 years. . . . And, so now a Democratic Party that seemed poised for electoral greatness has reverted back to the debilitating political condition that ailed it during the 1970s and 1980s. It is increasingly perceived as too liberal. It must convince the white working class that it will protect its interests—not just those of the very rich and very poor. Electoral success blinded the party to these nagging problems. Festering old perceptions have come back with a fury. That’s why Scott Brown and his pickup truck managed to drive such a large hole through the very center of the president’s agenda.

This is too convenient to pretend we suddenly discovered that Democrats drank the Leftist kool-aid and didn’t have some ideological bent towards Marxism. Is it only political cover to sign on with Obama’s Karl Marx propaganda or, as I feel, the politicians do whatever is politically convenient?

This ilk would sell out their grandmother if it saved their “job” in Washington.  The “debilitating political condition” has always existed, the majority power intoxicated the Left to act out their dreams. The same could be said for the GOP in it’s recent flirtation with a majority. Indeed!

On September 11, 2001 President George W. Bush was reading “My Pet Goat” to school children for 5 minutes after he was told that the second World Trade Center tower had been hit and that America was under attack.

Mr. Bush was attacked for this, we believe the President showed good judgment to stay calm and not upset the children.

Michael Moore’s controversial film, “Fahrenheit 9/11″ featured a video of Mr. Bush reading in the classroom. At the time Moore was probably sweating over a buffet table at Shoney’s Restaurant.

This morning Barack Hussein Obama and Secretary of Education Arne Duncan paid a visit to Graham Road Elementary School in Falls Church, Virginia. President Obama was addressing pool reporters. Instead of reading a book, “The One” read his teleprompter.

We doubt anyone in the mainstream or Fat Ass Michael Moore will be making a fuss.

If there was a homeland attack we’re sure Mr. Obama would simply wet himself and run for cover. Indeed!