Yes “Change to Win” is “Change to Lose” for free speech and employee rights to choose.
According to the Wall Street Journal “Big Labor” sent a letter to Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA) and Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Ct), both keepers of their respective power gates and huge contributors to the housing bubble at Fannie/Freddie.
Anna Burger, chair of the Change to Win federation, wrote that financial services firms and their trade group should “immediately cease all lobbying and advocacy” against “card check” legislation that would end the secret ballot in union elections.
The letter was sent directly to Steve Bartlett, chair of Financial Services Roundtable, but of course both Frank and Dodd have the real power over banks.
Mr. Bartlett has lobbied against the Employee Free Choice Act, which is “card-check” and would force employees to vote for the union label without a secret ballot.
“It is shameful that the Roundtable makes lobbying against the right of workers to organize a legislative priority and, worse yet, is using taxpayer-financed TARP subsidies to do so,” wrote Ms. Burger, whose group includes the Teamsters and the Service Employees International Union, among others. (WSJ)
This is one more attempt by Big Labor using their organized crime tactics to force secret ballots out and unions in without regard to companies and employees. Free to choose in labor is not a right for thugs like Ms. Burger.
The dirty little secret is organizations like Change to Win receive federal money too.
But if Big Labor wants to limit speech, why stop at the bankers? The unions, including those that belong to Change to Win, get plenty of government money for their affiliates to run job training and other programs. For that matter, many employees of companies that have received bailout cash — General Motors or Chrysler, say — use some of their wages to pay union dues. The unions then use those dues to become major political players at election time — to the tune of $450 million in the last election cycle, and that’s the amount they admit to spending. If banks can’t lobby against card check, the United Auto Workers ought to be banned from politics too. (WSJ)
This is one more example of the Left attempting to use power through intimidation to expand and control business. We see what that did for the auto industry. Indeed!

Powered by A Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy
Copyright © 2012 Liberally Conservative™ and Liberally Conservative.com™ are Registered Trademarks - All Rights Reserved
February 13th, 2009 at 12:26 pm
I have been telling this to my husband for months now. I told him the card check thing would leave him and others open to union intimidation. He works for an aerospace company that is not all union….thank heavens! We know who the first person that will start worker intimidation at his company. He has called here before and approached my husband at work. My husband told him where to put his union.
His division of the company had to take in union members from another part of the company….he says they are a disaster….one of the workers couldn’t even start the Learjet she has worked on for many years!
February 17th, 2009 at 3:16 pm
I love that cartoon. You can see the union label all over this recession, especially in the demise of Chrysler (almost a certainty by now) and probably GM (although Obama may just nationatize GM and Chrysler both).
February 17th, 2009 at 3:25 pm
GM/Chrysler have gone to bed with the bailout and are now in the beginning of nationalization. The govt. owns stock in those companies.