Benghazi – A New Right-Wing Conspiracy
“What difference at this point does it make?”
Right-Wing Conspiracy was a phrase coined by Hillary Clinton, former FLOTUS and Secretary of State who failed to report for duty when the US diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya came under terrorist attack on September 11, 2012. The initial "Right-Wing Conspiracy" came from Ms. Clinton when she accused Republicans of "targeting" her husband over the Monica Lewinsky affair. Bubba was impeached in the House but the cowards in the Senate took a pass while also giving one to the Liar-in-Chief.
In her own testimony before Congress in January before leaving office, Clinton was evasive, famously shouting at Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI), "What difference does it make?"
After months GOP members of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee will be holding new hearings and this time it is said they will be "explosive" with eyewitnesses to the attack will be testifying.
Once again the big question, still unanswered because of the Obama administration coverup will be, "Who knew what, and when did they know it.? The MSM is complicit in the coverup. The agenda this time is to protect Hillary Clinton at all costs.
The Benghazi attacks came close to the end of Clinton's tenure as Secretary of State and the investigation and hearings were on the heals of her departure. Her legacy is at stake but her future in politics could be permanently damaged. One could only hope.
One witness in particular, Mark I. Thompson, is expected to provide information that is highly damaging to Clinton. Thompson is a former Marine and the current deputy coordinator for operations in the agency's counter terrorism bureau. A second official at State has corroborated Thompson's statements:
"You should have seen what (Clinton) tried to do to us that night."
Thompson's attorney has stated:
"...his client has been subjected to threats and intimidation by as-yet-unnamed superiors at State, in advance of his cooperation with Congress."
Also appearing before the oversight committee on Wednesday will be Gregory N. Hicks, the deputy chief of mission at the U.S. Embassy in Libya at the time of the Benghazi terrorist attacks. Like Thompson, Hicks is a career State Department official who considers himself a Benghazi whistle-blower. His attorney, Victoria Toensing, a former chief counsel to the Senate Intelligence Committee, has charged that Hicks, too, has faced threats of reprisal from unnamed superiors at State.
This coverup, known as changing talking points in some circles, does not stop at State or Hillary Clinton. Barack Obama is not off the hook, he and his administration are at the center of this mass undermining of National Security and the deaths of an Ambassador and other members of the diplomatic corps.
All the rats on a sinking ship should drown. This includes anyone connected with the Benghazi coverup, past and present. They are all rats.
Hopefully this will be the end of Hillary Clinton's career and political ambitions. "What difference at this point does it make?" All the difference in the world.
Categories: Foreign Affairs, Media, Military, National Security, Politics, War on Terror Tags: barack obama, Benghazi, Gregory N. Hicks, Hillary Clinton, Mark I. Thompson, State Department
Obama’s Blood Trail – From Benghazi to Boston
What do the murders of four Americans in Benghazi have to do with the murders of three in a terrorist attack in Boston?
Plenty, if you understand what you are seeing in the abstract expressionism of the Jackson Pollock painting is actually a blood trail, and the Pollock painting you are closely studying is an exact reproduction of one of his earlier works. It is a reproduction of a reproduction.
We’ve seen this picture before, a bloodstained tangle of lies being sold to us as an artistic masterpiece. But you have to step farther back, not closer to the painting, to actually see the blood trail.
A new world order in the making. Understanding this should explain that the right-left paradigm is a historical artifact, and provide prospective in terms of how the government is pushing this agenda towards completion. We’ve been overtaken and captured from within.
Our intimate relationship with Saudi Arabia began in earnest (most recently) under George Herbert Walker Bush, and was further expanded by George W. Bush, a/k/a ‘Bandar Bush,’ a name earned for his intimate relationship with Prince Sultan bin Bandar of Saudi Arabia. It should be clear by now that the continuity of this globalist, Pan-Islamic agenda that existed under Bush was further solidified and even expanded by the Obama administration. It is not a political agenda, but a globalist one.
We do not have elected leaders who favor the U.S., but internationalists that favor the globalist agenda.
Read the full article here, digest it, understand it and make sure you share it.
Liberally Conservative appreciates your comments that abide by our guidelines:
Categories: Foreign Affairs, National Security, Politics, U.S. Constitution, War on Terror Tags: Benghazi, Boston Marathon, Saudi Arabia, terrorism
Disarming the Military to Fight Global Warming, Poverty
Progressive Agenda - Marxism for America!
The title is not so far fetched. Battle of Mogadishu aka Blackhawk Down started out as an aid mission and later escalated into the use of Army Rangers. When there is a world disaster such as a devastating Tsunami or earthquake many times we send Marines to help restore order and provide relief.
However, the Progressives aka Marxist inside the United States have further "missions" for or Armed Forces. After massively slashing the military and its funding, and wresting control of the funding process from Congress, the 2012 Unified Security Budget sought no less than to change the very role and mission of our US Armed Forces.
The authors recommend using the military to combat "global warming," fight global poverty, remedy "injustice," bolster the United Nations, and increase "peacekeeping" forces worldwide.
As poverty is a key contributor to state weakness, it is imperative for the United States to be actively engaged in the fight to end global poverty as a primary focus of our national security strategy. Effective US global development policy can support countries and people to manage their own way forward from poverty and injustice. As this helps improve the livelihoods of millions, it reduces the sources of discontent and disenfranchisement that fuel global security threats.
In other words, if only the polar ice caps weren't melting and our country's wealth was only redistributed to the developing world, Iran would simply stop seeking nuclear weapons, North Korea would quit being an aggressor, those al-Qaeda pests would just leave us alone, Russia and China would become partners for peace, and the bloated and corrupt bureaucracy that is today's UN would become a kind of global Mother Teresa, dispensing charity and goodness to all in need.
Center for American Progress (CAP) and Institute for Policy Studies, both Marxist front groups writing Obama policy for decades prior to his election, are plotting to take billions of dollars from the US Military and instead use them for a "green stimulus." These groups also envision the military as a tool to fight so-called global warming. This is known as "The Green Dividend", endorsed by CAP which defines as "a major shift of resources from the military budget to sustainable energy."
These groups call on the Pentagon to contribute to a green world "by simply getting out of the way, by handing over unneeded military installations to be converted into green job incubators."
A "Green Dividend" report makes no bones about the progressive group's ultimate agenda - the virtual disarmament of much of the US military, while transferring defense resources to fund alternative energy causes. They are using environmental activism as a guise for a far more sinister aim, namely disarming the United States.
Liberally Conservative appreciates your comments that abide by our guidelines:
Categories: Foreign Affairs, Global Warming, Military, National Security, Politics, Rules for Radicals, United Nations Tags: communism, George Soros, John Podesta, Marxism, Progressive Agenda
