OK, the Super Bowl is over and the two cities that sent teams – New York and Boston (New England) have huge lefty constituencies. Funny how they played in a Red State. But I digress, we talk politics here so let’s look at the Clint Eastwood Chyrsler ad that received flak for being pro-Obama. Of course Mr. Eastwood denies this was the purpose – OK, he was creatively used a by team that produced the two-minute minute spot for ad agency Wieden+Kennedy donated their personal time in 2008 to make pro-Obama art and privately supported Barack Obama in the 2008 election. Mr. Eastwood, you were duped.

Now we have two new ads, parodies that demonstrate the possibilities if you wish to promote the truth, the reality of the Chrysler bailout.

First we have Rush Limbaugh mocking the ad with seriousness and hilarity mixed in. At the end Rush ads his own little quip. Here’s the transcript followed by the audio:

“It’s halftime. Both teams are in their locker rooms, getting ready to win the first four years or a second term. It’s halftime in America, too. People are out of work and they’re hurting. And they’re all wondering what Obama’s gonna do to them next and they’re scared because he thinks this is a game.”

The parody goes on to say, “…all’s that matters now is that we come together as one great nation and kick his skinny butt back to Chicago. This country can’t be knocked out by one punk. We’ll get right back up again and, when we do, Obama’s gonna hear the roar of our engines. Yeah, it’s half-time America, are you ready to win?”

 

Next up Reality.TV added their version of an Eastwood-Chrysler ad:

 

 

Clint Eastwood is a Libertarian and registered as a Republican. His ad wouldn’t have caused such a furor if it didn’t come off as pro-Obama sending the false message that Detroit is back, the American auto industry is back.

Here are some facts. Chrysler manufactures many of their automobiles in Mexico and Canada. Chrysler is owned by Fiat, an Italian company. So the whole ad is filled with stench, with lies, and deceives the listener. How could have Eastwood missed all of this?

And let’s not forget that American taxpayers were left on the hook for $1.3 billion and this will never be paid back. Obama and his ilk will tell you their bailouts have been paid back in full. BIG LIE!

Yes America, it’s halftime and we’re at a precipice – freedom and liberty or tyranny? Barack Obama would choose tyranny but it’s time to push the US Constitution across the goal line and run out the clock on Obama and his Marxist ilk in Congress, in regulatory agencies and around the country. Wake up America, you’ve received your two-minute warning.

Liberally Conservative appreciates your comments that abide by our guidelines:

Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) did not mince words in a letter he sent to the White House. Mr. Rubio said that under the Obama’s first term in office:

…“more and more people have come to believe that America is becoming a deadbeat nation.”

Senator Rubio also said he would challenge any new debt increases as Obama Obama’s is prepared to request another increase the debt ceiling by a staggering $1.2 trillion which will cause the nation’s public debt to surpass the $16 trillion mark.

“I will oppose your request to continue borrowing and spending recklessly,” declared the first-term Senator.

The freshman from Florida did not stop with his direct hit on Obama and his failed leadership. If Barack Obama led the charge to reduce the country’s unsustainable debt in mid 2011 rather than punt the enterprise to a “Super Committee,” asserted Rubio, we’d already be on a pathway toward economic growth and prosperity.

“Unfortunately, the first three years of your presidency have been a profile in leadership failure.”

The letter concludes:

“America deserves leaders who will stand front and center, level with the American people about our challenges and offer real solutions to solve them.  Instead of simply asking for another debt ceiling increase, I urge you to come forward with a real plan to tackle our debt in 2012.”

1.6.12 – Obama Debt Ceiling Letter – FINAL

Liberally Conservative appreciates your comments that abide by our guidelines:

Recall the moment Barack Obama, seeking to position himself as being the champion of the middle-class, notoriously lamented with regards to the increasing cost of arugula from among the nation’s most sumptuous food markets?

Quoting the faux arugula-muncher-in-chief: “Anybody gone into Whole Foods lately and see what they charge for arugula?” the Illinois senator stated in 2007. “I mean, they’re charging a lot of money for this stuff.”

This was Obama almost five-years back when looking for his Party’s nomination, prior to pulling off his unforeseen triumph from the Democrat Iowa Caucus. He subsequently guaranteed that an Obama administration would definitely reduce explosive food expenses, that, indeed, had been less formidable compared to his various other pledges associated with healing the earth and blocking glaciers from melting.

And guess what, he essentially achieved a campaign promise. No, the cost of food is not more affordable currently compared to what it had been before Obama acquiring office. In reality, the food index is actually significantly greater. That satisfied promise to Iowans originates through ObamaCare, which in turn funneled $327,500 in “grants” to “help the Scott County Health Department market well being and great health lifestyle in the region,” noted the Quad-City Times prior to the beginning of 2012.

The huge taxpayer “slush fund” which is ObamaCare carves away this sort of financing for “wellness” activity beneath the rubric associated with “preventative care.” As the White House’s distinctive line of thinking goes, bureaucrats inside the Beltway provide the sagacity as well as competence to assist 300 million US citizens try to make wholesome lifestyle choices concerning their day-to-day lives superior to those individuals do. Therefore, when it comes to Iowa, Scott County is now bequeathed with taxpayer dollars to produce “roads and paths more amenable to bike riding and walking” in addition to promoting “community gardens and the wide availability of locally grown fruits and vegetables.”

While we all consider this, we’ve got no clue whether it may reduce the price of wholesome foods, in addition to contemplating Obama’s terminated assurances to date, anticipate the cost of leafy greens to sky rocket. Far more ’08 discussion continues to be in limbo.

Yet, Whole Foods is subsequently launching a store in Iowa, hence Michelle Obama at any rate boasts a destination to purchase high-priced fresh fruits and nuts somewhere between flying about the nation on board her carbon-spewing campaign aircraft.

As one Republican operative comments, “So at a time when the federal government is running trillion-dollar deficits, ObamaCare is using taxpayer dollars to fund projects to help reduce the price of arugula and other vegetables in Iowa.”

Essentially!

Preventative solutions, incidentally, had been precisely the protection Democrats hid behind in order to place tens of millions of dollars directly into ObamaCare in an effort to construct jungle gyms about play grounds throughout America.

Additionally, the Liberals ponder exactly why health care expenses are ascending north. It’s actually reached the level in which the Administration is actually hyping the belief that that they’ve had the capacity to push insurance providers to reduce the cost of increases when it surpasses ten percent. Call to mind it had been candidate Obama who promised that getting the federal government to take control of one-sixth of the US economy which is health care would definitely reduce insurance premiums by $2,500.

Today the White House boasts whenever insurance premiums don’t rise beyond ten percent. This is nothing less than Obama conveniently shifting the goal posts.

As reported by the Kaiser Family Foundation, insurance premiums with regard to households and individuals currently have increased by 9 and 8%, respectively. “The 9% growth rate in family premiums for 2011,” estimates Kaiser, “is significantly higher than the 3% growth rate in 2010.”

Prepare for Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid to claim if it weren’t for Obama “The One”, expenses for health care may very well be 25 % greater. Due to the fact Liberals under no circumstances wish themselves evaluated relating to the measures ensuing from their own policies. Not a chance. They wish to be assessed based for their motives exclusively.

Take pleasure in the extravagant vegetables following Iowa Caucus night, beloved Iowans. All things considered, we’re all assisting to finance them!

Liberally Conservative appreciates your comments that abide by our guidelines: