Comments on: Hillary Clinton – About Face, Two-Faced http://www.liberallyconservative.com/hillary-clinton-about-face-two-faced/ Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:29:09 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Liberally Conservative » Blog Archive » Alberto Gonzalez Should Fight and Stay http://www.liberallyconservative.com/hillary-clinton-about-face-two-faced/comment-page-1/#comment-9987 Liberally Conservative » Blog Archive » Alberto Gonzalez Should Fight and Stay Thu, 19 Apr 2007 13:52:10 +0000 http://www.liberallyconservative.com/?p=1754#comment-9987 [...] we wrote in Hillary Clinton - About Face, Two-Faced, the Clinton administration fired all 93 U. S. Attorney’s in March of 1993. They were given 10 [...] [...] we wrote in Hillary Clinton – About Face, Two-Faced, the Clinton administration fired all 93 U. S. Attorney’s in March of 1993. They were given 10 [...]

]]> By: EndGame http://www.liberallyconservative.com/hillary-clinton-about-face-two-faced/comment-page-1/#comment-4375 EndGame Thu, 15 Mar 2007 04:04:18 +0000 http://www.liberallyconservative.com/?p=1754#comment-4375 I am sick and tired of listening to Hillary Clinton praise Civil Rights activists like Martin Luther King jr. out of one side of her face while knowingly making a mockery of everything he stood for out of the other side, By allowing Child Protective Services to violate every Constitutional and Civil Right low-income Families have without putting a stop to it, The Civil Rights Martin Luther King jr. and others fought so long and hard for are meaningless in the eyes of the current administration if you are Poor... Everybody talks about how the NSA/CIA is violating your civil rights by listening in on your communications. But nobody is talking about America's Hidden Holocaust, the Destruction of Hundreds of Good and Innocent Low-Income Families by Child Protective Services... Currently Child Protective Services violates more civil rights on a daily basis then all other agencies combined, Including the NSA/CIA wiretaping program, and as a Senator of New York she's in violation of her oath of office to uphold the Constitution of the United States by permitting and encouraging CPS civil rights violations, particularly unconstitutional interviews of children at school without their parents' knowledge or permission.... By constitutional law she is guilty of treason against the United States of America.... These Illegal interviews by CPS at school without a court order are a Direct Violation of the Constitution as reaffirm by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals decision in Doe v. Heck... Note: IT’S UNCONSTITUTIONAL FOR DCF TO CONDUCT AN INVESTIGATION IN ANY HOME AND INTERVIEW A CHILD WITHOUT EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES (IMMINENT “PHYSICAL” DANGER) OR PROBABLE CAUSE. This also applies to the Illegal Interviews done at public school without the parents knowledge. Question: How is a child in "imminent physical danger" when the child is at school? The decision in the case of Doe et al, v. Heck et al (No. 01-3648, 2003 US App. Lexis 7144) will affect the manner in which law enforcement and Child Protective Services (“CPS”) investigations of alleged child abuse or neglect are conducted. The decision of the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals found that the practice of a “no prior consent” interview of a child will ordinarily constitute a “clear violation” of the constitutional rights of parents under the 4th and 14th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution. According to the Court, the investigative interview of a child constitutes a “search and seizure” and, when conducted on private property without “consent, a warrant, probable cause, or exigent circumstances,” such an interview is an unreasonable search and seizure in violation of the rights of the parent, child, and, possibly the owner of the private property.The mere possibility or risk of harm does not constitute an emergency or exigent circumstance that would justify a forced warrantless entry and a warrantless seizure of a child. Hurlman v. Rice, (2nd Cir. 1991) Personally, I Do Not appreciate Child Protective Services using the Constitution of the United States as Toilet Paper in a Time of War, while the Good Men and Women of our Armed Forces are Fighting and Dying for It." In closing all I can ask you is, would you want [ Your Children ] interviewed at School by CPS without a court order, your knowledge, permission, you or your attorney Being Present? THINK ABOUT IT... I am sick and tired of listening to Hillary Clinton praise Civil Rights activists like Martin Luther King jr. out of one side of her face while knowingly making a mockery of everything he stood for out of the other side, By allowing Child Protective Services to violate every Constitutional and Civil Right low-income Families have without putting a stop to it, The Civil Rights Martin Luther King jr. and others fought so long and hard for are meaningless in the eyes of the current administration if you are Poor… Everybody talks about how the NSA/CIA is violating your civil rights by listening in on your communications. But nobody is talking about America’s Hidden Holocaust, the Destruction of Hundreds of Good and Innocent Low-Income Families by Child Protective Services… Currently Child Protective Services violates more civil rights on a daily basis then all other agencies combined, Including the NSA/CIA wiretaping program, and as a Senator of New York she’s in violation of her oath of office to uphold the Constitution of the United States by permitting and encouraging CPS civil rights violations, particularly unconstitutional interviews of children at school without their parents’ knowledge or permission….

By constitutional law she is guilty of treason against the United States of America….

These Illegal interviews by CPS at school without a court order are a Direct Violation of the Constitution as reaffirm by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals decision in Doe v. Heck…

Note: IT’S UNCONSTITUTIONAL FOR DCF TO CONDUCT AN INVESTIGATION IN ANY HOME AND INTERVIEW A CHILD WITHOUT EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES (IMMINENT “PHYSICAL” DANGER) OR PROBABLE CAUSE.

This also applies to the Illegal Interviews done at public school without the parents knowledge.
Question: How is a child in “imminent physical danger” when the child is at school?

The decision in the case of Doe et al, v. Heck et al (No. 01-3648, 2003 US App. Lexis 7144) will affect the manner in which law enforcement and Child Protective Services (“CPS”) investigations of alleged child abuse or neglect are conducted. The decision of the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals found that the practice of a “no prior consent” interview of a child will ordinarily constitute a “clear violation” of the constitutional rights of parents under the 4th and 14th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution. According to the Court, the investigative interview of a child constitutes a “search and seizure” and, when conducted on private property without “consent, a warrant, probable cause, or exigent circumstances,” such an interview is an unreasonable search and seizure in violation of the rights of the parent, child, and, possibly the owner of the private property.The mere possibility or risk of harm does not constitute an emergency or exigent circumstance that would justify a forced warrantless entry and a warrantless seizure of a child. Hurlman v. Rice, (2nd Cir. 1991)

Personally, I Do Not appreciate Child Protective Services using the Constitution of the United States as Toilet Paper in a Time of War, while the Good Men and Women of our Armed Forces are Fighting and Dying for It.”

In closing all I can ask you is, would you want [ Your Children ] interviewed at School by CPS without a court order, your knowledge, permission, you or your attorney Being Present? THINK ABOUT IT…

]]>