Comments on: Obama Supports Murdering the Unborn – It’s His Promise!!

By: Liberally Conservative

Liberally Conservative — Tue, 16 Feb 2010 03:32:58 +0000

Your kidding right?

Obama only deserves credit for not taking responsibility for his lack of ability and royaling screwing up the economy. With a majority in Congress he can’t pass legislation (thank God) and blames Republicans. Why when they can pass anything they want?

Indeed, Obama is not pro-life, he voted three times for infanticide which is MURDER! That’s when he got around to not voting present. Yes, Obama votes to kill baby’s and that is a fact.

And Obama would still work with tyrants and not publicly support the people of Iran who are fighting a regime who murders them in the streets. Obama supports Chavez, Ortega, Castro but not the Honduran government.

Obama hasn’t cleaned up Haiti but if this was GWB it would be Katrina all over again. They still haven’t cleaned up New Orleans and Obama has been there once for less than one-hour. Is that still Bushes fault?

By: Meaghan

Meaghan — Mon, 15 Feb 2010 23:25:25 +0000

Oh I must not know the good things that Bush did so please inform me.
At least I can say that Obama thinks in other people’s interest not only his pocketbook,
and he will admit that things are messed up and not lead us in a blind goose-chase.

By: Meaghan

Meaghan — Mon, 15 Feb 2010 22:47:14 +0000

“What should we believe when Barack Hussein Obama speaks? In his short time in the US Senate abortion related bills have come up for vote and Obama has only voted once.

S AMDT 244 to S Con Res 18: To expand access to preventive health care services that reduce unintended pregnancy (including teen pregnancy), reduce the number of abortions, and improve access to women’s health care. This amendment would have provided more taxpayer funds for “unintended pregnancies.” Obama voted Yes, the amendment was defeated. (3/17/05)

S Amdt 2707 to HR 2764: To prohibit funding of organizations that support coercive abortion. This amendment won and Obama did not vote. (9/06/07)

S Amdt 3330 to S Amdt 3325 to HR 3043: To prohibit the provision of funds to grantees who perform abortions. This amendment was defeated but Obama did not vote. (10/18/07)

S Amdt 3896 to S Amdt 3899 to S 1200: To modify a section relating to limitation on use of funds appropriated to the Service. This amendment was adopted but Obama did not vote. (2/26/08)”

From the above article about Obama’s voting reflects that he supports the provisions to prevent
pregnancies and improve women’s health care, but the article was defeated showing that most
of the others in Washington don’t value this as much.

And Obama did not vote on the others perhaps because of party pressures. He didn’t vote if he
didn’t want to take a side for some reason, so he did not support any of the others that advocate
abortions and give provisions to those who have abortions. He simply supported preventative
measures for unintended pregnancies, is that a problem with anyone?

By: Liberally Conservative

Liberally Conservative — Mon, 15 Feb 2010 20:21:56 +0000

Open your eyes. Infanticide is murder as well as other planned abortions. Your choice is to be abstinate or use protection. It’s that simple. Once your pregnant take responsibility.

BTW..Obama is inept and don’t compare him to Bush who at least had experience in the Governor’s house in Texas. See http://www.liberallyconservative.com/bush-had-an-mba-obama-has-community-organizing/

You’re the blind one, indeed!

By: Meaghan

Meaghan — Mon, 15 Feb 2010 20:14:50 +0000

Just because he’s not pro life doesn’t mean that he wants to kill babies,
don’t be so cynical and closed minded. Would you rather women having to travel
to other countries to have unsafe abortions, attempting/giving themselves unsafe
abortions OR would you rather have a procedure safely done in America because
there’s no way to stop abortions completely.
For instance, in the 2000 presidential campaign Bush called himself a fiscal conservative
but federal spending under his administration skyrocketed in a war of aggression, here is
some proof:
“Early in the term, “I had high hopes for Bush” changing the tone, said Rep. Ray LaHood
(R-Ill.), a voice of civility in Congress. “We were on the high road then, but now I think
we’ve hit an all-time low.” – “It’s his way or no way,” said Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.), the
Senate minority whip. “He’s a man who campaigned on having a better relationship, and
it’s exactly the opposite of what he said he would do. I’ve never served with anybody who
is so uncooperative.”"
Obama has a lot to deal with and he probably will not be able to accomplish all the goals he has
set, but Bush would set a goal such as:
”I would work with our friends in OPEC to convince them to open up the spigot, to increase
the supply,” Mr. Bush, the presumptive Republican candidate for president, told reporters
here today. ”Use the capital that my administration will earn, with the Kuwaitis or the Saudis, and convince them to open up the spigot.” as he promised to lower the price of gasoline, which obviously went
unfulfilled and actually the price of gas is still $1.50 more than it was in the Clinton
administration.
Obama at least deserves the credit that he is willing to take on the problems that have
obviously been created by the Bush administration. He wishes to take the issues such as
abortion rights, where ideas are deeply rooted and split, and bring the nation together
for the common good of every person not just to people that agree with him. If you don’t
believe what I’m saying, look up the evidence for yourself, Obama has already helped us
in many ways, but there is only 24 hours in a day, so how much can be done is limited and
requires time and patience for the nation and economy to return to normal.

By: Liberally Conservative » Blog Archive » Obama Still Doesn’t Understand Murder, Abortion or Conception

Sun, 17 Aug 2008 14:01:17 +0000

[...] Obama Attempts to Flip on Abortion but Flops! and Obama Supports Murdering the Unborn – It’s His Promise!! we demonstrated that Obama has gone so far to vote, as an Illinois legislator, for partial-birth [...]

By: Liberally Conservative

Liberally Conservative — Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:39:03 +0000

Abortions since Roe v. Wade in 1973? 48,589,993 Link up here and cry!

By: CKA in Red State USA

CKA in Red State USA — Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:33:48 +0000

Thanks for your post.

Not enough can be said about CINO—-Christian in name only—-Barack Obama and his support, if not championship, of infanticide.

What he and those who support abortion do not comprehend is that we in the U.S. have now stood by and allowed the killing of almost as many people who died during the Second World War as combatants and non-combatants.

And who knows what genius, what solutions to our problems, what greatness and creativity we have murdered?

BTW: I refer to Obama as CINO because he cannot be a believer, and certainly not a follower of Christ Jesus, and simultaneously support abortion. Unfortunately, in all those years of he apparently slept on the pews of TUCC and no one, including wife Michelle, ever bothered to awaken him and inform him of that.