Comments on: Those Pesky Military Votes – Obama Justice Says NO!

By: Nickolas

Nickolas — Mon, 13 Sep 2010 22:46:55 +0000

CNN: normally objective.
MSNBC: NEVER objective.
NPR: normally biased both ways.
CBS, ABC, NBC: I don’t know, I don’t watch those stations.
PBS: Offers sources and everything, you have to check every story.

I just want real proof of the claim, not to get into a fight about left-wing vs right-wing media. Calm down.

By: Don Bistroff

Don Bistroff — Mon, 13 Sep 2010 22:24:26 +0000

Blah, Blah, Blah, Just because you don’t like FoxNews suddenly it’s not objective. I suppose you like CNN and MSNBC? Now that’s objective. Or NPR, CBS, ABC, PBS, NBC – oh yeah, now we’re talking Left-Wing Media with no center right voice.

At least Fox has Left-Wingers on – too many for my taste. In fact, maybe we should go to the Marxist Media Matters for their opinion which is quite on par with your own.

By: Nickolas

Nickolas — Mon, 13 Sep 2010 21:59:10 +0000

Not having an objective source means that it probably isn’t true.
FACT: things aren’t fact just because you said they are facts.
I could easily say
FACT: this statement is false.

By: Don Bistroff

Don Bistroff — Sat, 11 Sep 2010 22:26:43 +0000

Bringing facts or criticizing government officials is not libel. Sue me, please!

By: Nickolas

Nickolas — Sat, 11 Sep 2010 17:55:38 +0000

Where is your source on this? I don’t mean the source of the story, and the source of the letter, I mean absolute proof that this is occurring.

Without the proof, this is libel. And I, personally believe that libel should be considered an infringement on the Freedom of Information.

Just saying.

By: Alfred Kasack

Alfred Kasack — Thu, 12 Aug 2010 11:14:23 +0000

Now I am not certain I fully agree with you on this post. Even so I am normally open to original concepts. May have to think about it. Great blog incidentally.